<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Brett Hutley&#039;s Blog &#187; Stock Analysis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bretthutley.com/tag/stock-analysis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bretthutley.com</link>
	<description>Home on the Digital Range</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 21:21:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Evaluating Bio-Techs</title>
		<link>http://bretthutley.com/2009/11/13/evaluating-bio-techs/</link>
		<comments>http://bretthutley.com/2009/11/13/evaluating-bio-techs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 11:15:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>brett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BioTech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quant Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stock Analysis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bretthutley.com/?p=226</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clinton Chee has posted a list of factors he thinks is important when analyzing Bio-Tech stocks. This list is summarized below: P : Price of stock NTA : Net Tangible Assets (Total Assets minus Intellectual property and other intangibles) P/NTA : Ratio of Price to NTA - a value of 3 or below is considered [...]


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://bretthutley.com/2009/09/14/financial-models-need-more-complexity/' rel='bookmark' title='Financial models need more complexity?'>Financial models need more complexity?</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clinton Chee has posted <a href="http://ozstock.blogspot.com/2007/01/biotech-valuation-indices.html">a list of factors</a> he thinks is important when analyzing Bio-Tech stocks. This list is summarized below:
<p>
<span id="more-226"></span></p>
<ul>
<li><b>P</b> : Price of stock</li>
<li><b>NTA</b> : Net Tangible Assets (Total Assets minus Intellectual property and other intangibles)</li>
<li><b>P/NTA</b> : Ratio of Price to NTA - a value of 3 or below is considered underpriced and worth buying. A value of 9 or above is definitely not worth buying</li>
<li><b>TEAM</b> : Rating system based on the qualifications of the directors
<ol>
<li>Professor = 1.5</li>
<li>PhD = 1.0</li>
<li>Master = 0.8</li>
<li>Hons = 0.7</li>
<li>MBA = 0.6</li>
<li>Biotech Exp (10year) = 0.5</li>
</ol>
</li>
<li><b>BurnPeriod (Runway)</b> : the number of quarters left before cash runs out, based on the previous quarters cash burn rate. Over 4 quarters is fair. Over 8 quarters is worth investing.</li>
<li><b>ProductPipe</b> : the stage of the product development ranging from pre-clinical tests to commercialization. Over a value of 5.0 is a good sign.
<ol>
<li>Phase 1 = 1</li>
<li>Phase 2 = 2</li>
<li>Phase 3 = 3</li>
<li>Market Approved = 4</li>
<li>In Market =5</li>
</ol>
</li>
<li><b>ForeignMarket</b> : Companies with products that sell internationally are more highly rated. (see key below). Over a value of 3 is a good sign.
<ol>
<li>Plan to Enter = 0.5</li>
<li>Just Entered = 0.9</li>
<li>1-3 years = 1.5</li>
<li>Over 3 years = 2.0</li>
</ol>
</li>
<li><b>Cash/Debt</b> : the ratio of cash to debt of the company.</li>


<p>Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://bretthutley.com/2009/09/14/financial-models-need-more-complexity/' rel='bookmark' title='Financial models need more complexity?'>Financial models need more complexity?</a></li>
</ol></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bretthutley.com/2009/11/13/evaluating-bio-techs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

